- 22 Jul 14, 21:38#409400
No, it's not. That is a direct quote from the New Republic. (First paragraph)
http://www.newrepublic.com/node/118782
Even if that is what a Ukrainian fighting in the Ukraine believes that is in no way evidence that Russia is involved.
'One says bodies appear to have been dead longer than official reports. We can't believe this, therefore Russia shot down the plane.'
You see, that doesn't quite work logically. I could just in turn say, 'Brits tend to lambaste foreigners on buses. If a butterfly flaps its wings in the West there can be a great storm in the East, therefore Britain shot down the plane.' You see, that again does not logically work (or it does, if you get my greater point).
Meaning, there is no connection between what you are saying and reality. You're trying to make me out to be a Russian propagandist or spy, when all I said was that one tragedy is not made right by another. You see, your attribution of false words in an attempt to make me sound crazy is not in any way logical, and suggests where the real propaganda lies.
And from the same site you linked:
US: No Evidence Of Direct Russian Link To Plane Crash
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/us-no ... nk-to-mh17
Meaning one must wonder why the US is so intent on blaming Russia while admitting at the same time there is no evidence. And meanwhile Russia releases satellite and radar images while the US releases photoshop 'evidence' to the press while quietly admitting they have no evidence.
http://www.newrepublic.com/node/118782
Even if that is what a Ukrainian fighting in the Ukraine believes that is in no way evidence that Russia is involved.
'One says bodies appear to have been dead longer than official reports. We can't believe this, therefore Russia shot down the plane.'
You see, that doesn't quite work logically. I could just in turn say, 'Brits tend to lambaste foreigners on buses. If a butterfly flaps its wings in the West there can be a great storm in the East, therefore Britain shot down the plane.' You see, that again does not logically work (or it does, if you get my greater point).
Meaning, there is no connection between what you are saying and reality. You're trying to make me out to be a Russian propagandist or spy, when all I said was that one tragedy is not made right by another. You see, your attribution of false words in an attempt to make me sound crazy is not in any way logical, and suggests where the real propaganda lies.
And from the same site you linked:
US: No Evidence Of Direct Russian Link To Plane Crash
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/us-no ... nk-to-mh17
Meaning one must wonder why the US is so intent on blaming Russia while admitting at the same time there is no evidence. And meanwhile Russia releases satellite and radar images while the US releases photoshop 'evidence' to the press while quietly admitting they have no evidence.