- 08 Mar 13, 23:34#348995
A racing car that does not win, is just art
I think as money tightens teams can not be as choosy with colour coordinated sponsors
A racing car that does not win, is just art
Discuss the sport you love with other motorsport fans
Red Bull's livery is a mess now in my view. You've got the basic dark blue, then some bits of red for Total, yellow marks for Red Bull itself, the red of the Bull logo, the tricolour stripes, then the bloody purple... that purple has just pushed it over the edge. It's not even 'colourful' just a mash of too many colours - that Benetton was colourful! WB's analogy is pretty apt really. That said, i thought last year when they had that lighter blue shade at Silverstone, at a distance when you couldn't see all the pictures, the car really suited that overall look.
The problem is that they banned ciggie advertising! Now it's all just boring corporations who want to be seen in a 'sensible' light. All the best colour schemes are on tin tops these days.
The RB9 livery is so horrible it's leading the poll. It's certainly the most exciting colour scheme on this seasons grid.
Actually the majority think that is ISN'T the best looking car
The RB9 livery is so horrible it's leading the poll. It's certainly the most exciting colour scheme on this seasons grid.
I wonder how a 'colour scheme' could be deemed 'exciting'.
Actually the majority think that it ISN'T the best looking car
Not according to the poll.
Well if you want to twist the results of the poll then whatever.
Well if you want to twist the results of the poll then whatever.
Smetimes sponsors make a car look less plain.
And red bull have crap sponsors
and a crap l;ivery with a million colours
and the nose is ugly and the whole thing is ugly!
Smetimes sponsors make a car look less plain.
And red bull have crap sponsors
and a crap l;ivery with a million colours
and the nose is ugly and the whole thing is ugly!
See our F1 related articles too!